Autism and Development Disorders Essay

This clause was establish on research fatiguee on tykeren ages three to ten years around the tendency and reactions of children with Autism. It discusses the differences between those with Autism, and those without autism, specifi surroundy how they react, perceive, and overcome certain developmental musts in childhood. These results are taken from the Childrens Behavior Questionnaire, which present the xvi dimensions of child perceptions, which includes activity level, anger and frustration, approach and withdrawal, and problems focusing. These are barely a few behaviors they suggest protagonist distinguish between children, as well as the different reactions that whitethorn suggest Autism is present in a child. This article then discusses how they went about proveing the bases of different children. They had one theme as a control, kids that had previously been tested on the Child Autism Rating Scale and proved negatively to having Autism, and a crowd of kids that when pr eviously tested, proved positive for Autism. They wanted to see how the Affect Regulation, and temperament varied between the groups.To test this Konstantareas and Stewart gathered a test group of nineteen children every last(predicate) with previous proven forms of Autism and tested them with a created Demographic Questionnaire. In this questionnaire it asks what rating a child received on the Child Autism Rating Scale, as well as investigating the income bracket in which each family would be placed, as well as an additional examination to figure out the childs level of cognitive functioning. Testing what Kostantareas and Stewart call the DP II which is a rating for children from birth to age nine, tapping into stills in five areas of functioning, including physical, self-help, social, academic, and communication. After all of the data was collected all of the children with Autism Spectrum were combined and used to determine if they had Affect Regulation. The results indicated tha t the children with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) were more likely to give their lower level ofAR strategies, such as trying to hide an object or cargo hold in longer, rather than to ask if they could keep the object or immediately return it to the experimenter.This experiment besides suggests that those diagnosed with ASD performed worse than the control group without ASD, suggesting those with Autism perform at a lower standard than those without. After adaptation this article and gathering all the information, Ive formed my own ideas on Konstantareas and Stewarts findings. In their later(prenominal) analysis on what they found, they suggest that children with ASD develop slower, and are found to be less competent than those who dont. I feel there was flaw in this testing, instead of comparing these ASD patients with a control group they should be differentiated to others with ASD in different settings. This select suggests some limitations posed by the collecting of data, including assumptions made based on previous research, and the flawed collection places couldve resulted in skewed findings. They collected this information over the scream via the parents in a control room setting. Other contributors in this study suggest that perhaps a more spotless path to measure a childs AR would be in a less controlled setting such as school, or home.This would help with the data collected to be more accurate because the tested children would be more comfortable in their environment, and may perform wear in a comfortable place. Which I prevail with, the only way to see how a child truly acts, and reacts to certain problems is to see them in the environment theyre used to, children are susceptible and stern be swayed easily by something they see in a control room setting. In this article it suggests that cognitive development is solely linked to AR, which I think is false. To say that Affect Regulation is the only way to successfully measure a childs gro wth is an inaccurate way to think, I think however that a childs growth is measured by a flake of things not just how they measure on a scale of AR. This article also suggests that moderating temperament scales is a way to better measure children with and without ASD. I disagree completely and feel the only way to receive accurate results in the measurement of a childs temperament is to alter how the results boilers suit were collected, not the scale they were measured on.This change should base these ASD children individually instead of lumping them together in a sample on a scale. The final thing this article suggests is creating some comparisons in and between subgroups, check factors to subcategories andtrends from within the group as a whole, once again not representing the individuals but a group of similar ASD children, no exceptions accounted for. There are a few things about this article I agree with. It suggests that childrens feelings for determining ASD cannot be pro perly measured by interviews, because children with ASD do not regularly show feelings, and when they do express them in a very different way than those without ASD. It suggests that a new study should be done to show the true temperament (pg. 10) of the kids in order to achieve the most accurate results.These researchers should find children with ASD that have both extremely severe cases, and those with more mild cases, test them against each other, and compare them to the differences of those without any form of ASD. If done this suggested way they would predict to the greatest ability how AR exists in ASD children, and in what ways it hindered them performing everyday activities. In many ways ASD affects children with Autisms AR and temperament. Correct and stiff ways to measure these in diagnosed children must be done in order to see what disabilities they may have in performing tasks later on in everyday life.